Giải Đề Cambridge IELTS 19 – Test 4: Reading Passage 3 – The Unselfish Gene
Tham khảo bài giải thích chi tiết của Đề Cambridge IELTS 19 – Test 4: Reading Passage 3 – The Unselfish Gene ngay tại đây nhé!
A. Bài đọc The Unselfish Gene
The Unselfish Gene
A psychologist gives his view on how humans became self-centred
There has long been a general assumption that human beings are essentially selfish. We’re apparently ruthless, with strong impulses to compete against each other for resources and to accumulate power and possessions. If we are kind to one another, it’s usually because we have ulterior motives. If we are good, it’s only because we have managed to control and transcend our innate selfishness and brutality.
This bleak view of human nature is closely associated with the science writer Richard Dawkins, whose 1976 book The Selfish Gene became popular because it fitted so well with – and helped to justify – the competitive and individualistic ethos that was so prevalent in late 20th-century societies. Like many others, Dawkins justifies his views with reference to the field of evolutionary psychology. Evolutionary psychology theorises that present-day human traits developed in prehistoric times, during what is termed the ‘environment of evolutionary adaptedness’.
Prehistory is usually seen as a period of intense competition, when life was such a brutal battle that only those with traits such as selfishness, aggression and ruthlessness survived. And because survival depended on access to resources – such as rivers, forests and animals – there was bound to be conflict between rival groups, which led to the development of traits such as racism and warfare. This seems logical. But, in fact, the assumption on which this all rests – that prehistoric life was a desperate struggle for survival – is false.
It’s important to remember that in the prehistoric era, the world was very sparsely populated. According to some estimates, around 15,000 years ago, the population of Europe was only 29,000, and the population of the whole world was less than half a million. Humans at that time were hunter-gatherers: people who lived by hunting wild animals and collecting wild plants. With such small population densities, it seems unlikely that prehistoric hunter-gatherer groups had to compete against each other for resources or had any need to develop ruthlessness and competitiveness, or to go to war.
There is significant evidence to back this notion from contemporary hunter-gatherer groups, who live in the same way as prehistoric humans did. As the anthropologist Bruce Knauft has remarked, hunter-gatherers are characterized by ‘extreme political and sexual egalitarianism’. Knauft has observed that individuals in such groups don’t accumulate property or possessions and have an ethical obligation to share everything. They also have methods of preserving egalitarianism by ensuring that disparities of status don’t arise.
The !Kung people of southern Africa, for example, swap arrows before going hunting and when an animal is killed, the acclaim does not go to the person who fired the arrow, but to the person the arrow belongs to. And if a person becomes too domineering, the other members of the group ostracise them, exiling the offender from society. Typically in such groups, men do not dictate what women do. Women in hunter-gatherer groups worldwide often benefit from a high level of autonomy, being able to select their own marriage partners, decide what work they do and work whenever they choose to. And if a marriage breaks down, they have custody rights over their children.
Many anthropologists believe that societies such as the !Kung were normal until a few thousand years ago, when population growth led to the development of agriculture and a settled lifestyle. In view of the above, there seems little reason to assume that traits such as racism, warfare and male domination should have been selected by evolution – as they would have been of little benefit in the prehistoric era. Individuals who behaved selfishly and ruthlessly would be less likely to survive, since they would have been ostracised from their groups.
It makes more sense, then, to see traits such as cooperation, egalitarianism, altruism and peacefulness as innate characteristics of human beings. These were the traits that were prevalent in human life for tens of thousands of years. So presumably these traits are still strong in us now.
But if prehistoric life wasn’t really as brutal as has often been assumed, why do modern humans behave so selfishly and ruthlessly? Perhaps these negative traits should be seen as a later development, the result of environmental and psychological factors. Research has shown repeatedly that when the natural habitats of primates such as apes and gorillas are disrupted, they tend to become more violent and hierarchical.
So, it could well be that the same thing has happened to us. I believe that the end of the hunter-gatherer lifestyle and the advent of farming was connected to a psychological change that occurred in some groups of people. There was a new sense of individuality and separateness, which led to a new selfishness, and ultimately to hierarchical societies, patriarchy and warfare. At any rate, these negative traits appear to have developed so recently that it doesn’t seem feasible to explain them in adaptive or evolutionary terms.
B. Bài tập
Questions 27-30
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Write the correct letter in boxes 27-30 on your answer sheet.
27. What is the writer doing in the first paragraph?
28. What point is made about Richard Dawkins’ book The Selfish Gene?
29. What does the writer suggest about the prehistoric era in the fourth paragraph?
30. The writer refers to Bruce Knauft’s work as support for the idea that
Questions 31-35
Complete the summary below.
Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes 31-35 on your answer sheet.
Contemporary hunter-gatherer societies
Bruce Knauft’s research shows that contemporary hunter-gatherer societies tend to exhibit a high level of 31 in all areas of life. In these cultures, distributing resources fairly among all members is a moral obligation. These societies also employ strategies to prevent differences in 32 occurring: for example, the !Kung follow a custom whereby the credit for one person’s success at 33 is given to another member of the group. Individuals who behave in a 34 manner are punished by being excluded from the group, and women have a considerable amount of 35 in choices regarding work and marriage.
Questions 36-40
Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer in Reading Passage 3?I
In boxes 36-40 on your answer sheet, write
YES if the statement agrees with the views of the writer
NO if the statement contradicts the views of the writer
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
Điểm số của bạn là % - đúng / câu
C. Giải thích chi tiết
Questions 27-30: Dạng Multiple Choice Questions Cách làm:
Chứng minh các đáp án ĐÚNG/SAI bằng cách lần lượt trả lời 2 câu hỏi:
| |
27. What is the writer doing in the first paragraph? | |
C. describing a commonly held belief about people’s behaviour Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án là C | Đoạn 1 There has long been a general assumption that human beings are essentially selfish. |
A. setting out two opposing views about human nature Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án A là FALSE | Đoạn 1: There has long been a general assumption that human beings are essentially selfish. |
B. justifying his opinion about our tendency to be greedy Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án B là FALSE | Đoạn 1: There has long been a general assumption that human beings are essentially selfish. |
D. explaining why he thinks that humans act in a selfish manner Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án D là NOT GIVEN | Đoạn 1: […] We’re apparently ruthless, with strong impulses to compete against each other for resources and to accumulate power and possessions. If we are kind to one another, it’s usually because we have ulterior motives. If we are good, it’s only because we have managed to control and transcend our innate selfishness and brutality. |
28. What point is made about Richard Dawkins’ book The Selfish Gene? | |
C. It presented a view that was in line with the attitudes of its time. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án là C | Đoạn 2: This bleak view of human nature is closely associated with the science writer Richard Dawkins, whose 1976 book The Selfish Gene became popular because it fitted so well with – and helped to justify – the competitive and individualistic ethos that was so prevalent in late 20th-century societies. |
A. Its appeal lay in the radical nature of its ideas. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án A là FALSE | Đoạn 2: This bleak view of human nature is closely associated with the science writer Richard Dawkins, whose 1976 book The Selfish Gene became popular because it fitted so well with – and helped to justify -the competitive and individualistic ethos that was so prevalent in late 20th-century societies. |
B. Its success was due to the scientific support it offered. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án B là FALSE | Đoạn 2: This bleak view of human nature is closely associated with the science writer Richard Dawkins, whose 1976 book The Selfish Gene became popular because it fitted so well with -and helped to justify -the competitive and individualistic ethos that was so prevalent in late 20th-century societies. |
D. It took an innovative approach to the analysis of human psychology. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án D là FALSE | Đoạn 2: […] Like many others, Dawkins justifies his views with reference to the field of evolutionary psychology. |
29. What does the writer suggest about the prehistoric era in the fourth paragraph? | |
B. Supplies of natural resources were probably relatively plentiful. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án là B | Đoạn 4: It’s important to remember that in the prehistoric era, the world was very sparsely populated. According to some estimates, around 15,000 years ago, the population of Europe was only 29,000, and the population of the whole world was less than half a million. Humans at that time were hunter-gatherers: people who lived by hunting wild animals and collecting wild plants. With such small population densities, it seems unlikely that prehistoric hunter-gatherer groups had to compete against each other for resources or had any need to develop ruthlessness and competitiveness, or to go to war. |
A. Societies were more complex than many people believe. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án A là NOT GIVEN | |
C. Most estimates about population sizes are likely to be inaccurate. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án C là NOT GIVEN | Đoạn 4: […] According to some estimates, around 15,000 years ago, the population of Europe was only 29,000, and the population of the whole world was less than half a million. |
D. Humans moved across continents more than was previously thought. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án D là NOT GIVEN | . |
30. The writer refers to Bruce Knauft’s work as support for the idea that | |
A. selfishness is a relatively recent development in human societies. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án là A | Đoạn 5: There is significant evidence to back this notion from contemporary hunter-gatherer groups, who live in the same way as prehistoric humans did. As the anthropologist Bruce Knauft has remarked, hunter-gatherers are characterised by ‘extreme political and sexual egalitarianism’. Knauft has observed that individuals in such groups don’t accumulate property or possessions and have an ethical obligation to share everything. |
B. only people in isolated communities can live in an unselfish manner. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án B là NOT GIVEN | Đoạn 5: […] Knauft has observed that individuals in such groups don’t accumulate property or possessions and have an ethical obligation to share everything. |
C. very few lifestyles have survived unchanged since prehistoric times. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án D là FALSE | Đoạn 5: There is significant evidence to back this notion from contemporary hunter-gatherer groups, who live in the same way as prehistoric humans did. |
D. hunter-gatherer cultures worldwide are declining in number. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án D là NOT GIVEN | |
Questions 31-35: Dạng Summary Completion without a wordlist Cách làm:
| |
31. Bruce Knauft’s research shows that contemporary hunter-gatherer societies tend to exhibit a high level of ____ in all areas of life. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án là egalitarianism | Đoạn 5: […] As the anthropologist Bruce Knauft has remarked, hunter-gatherers are characterised by ‘extreme political and sexual egalitarianism’. |
32. These societies also employ strategies to prevent differences in ____.occurring: Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án là status | Đoạn 5: […] They also have methods of preserving egalitarianism by ensuring that disparities of status don’t arise. |
33. for example, the !Kung follow a custom whereby the credit for one person’s success at ____ is given to another member of the group. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án là hunting | Đoạn 6: […] The !Kung people of southern Africa, for example, swap arrows before going hunting and when an animal is killed, the acclaim does not go to the person who fired the arrow, but to the person the arrow belongs to. |
34. Individuals who behave in a ____.. manner are punished by being excluded from the group, Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án là domineering | Đoạn 6: […] And if a person becomes too domineering, the other members of the group ostracise them, exiling the offender from society. |
35. and women have a considerable amount of ____ in choices regarding work and marriage. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án là autonomy | Đoạn 6: […] Women in hunter-gatherer groups worldwide often benefit from a high level of autonomy, being able to select their own marriage partners, decide what work they do and work whenever they choose to. |
Questions 36 – 40: Dạng YES/NO/NOT GIVEN Cách làm:
Chọn đáp án bằng cách lần lượt trả lời 2 câu hỏi:
| |
36. Some anthropologists are mistaken about the point when the number of societies such as the !Kung began to decline. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án là NOT GIVEN | Đoạn 7: Many anthropologists believe that societies such as the !Kung were normal until a few thousand years ago, when population growth led to the development of agriculture and a settled lifestyle. |
37. Humans who developed warlike traits in prehistory would have had an advantage over those who did not. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án là NO | Đoạn 7: […] In view of the above, there seems little reason to assume that traits such as racism, warfare and male domination should have been selected by evolution – as they would have been of little benefit in the prehistoric era. |
38. Being peaceful and cooperative is a natural way for people to behave. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án là YES | Đoạn 8: It makes more sense, then, to see traits such as cooperation, egalitarianism, altruism and peacefulness as innate characteristics of human beings. |
39. Negative traits are more apparent in some modern cultures than in others. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án là NOT GIVEN | Đoạn 9: […] Perhaps these negative traits should be seen as a later development, the result of environmental and psychological factors. |
40. Animal research has failed to reveal a link between changes in the environment and the emergence of aggressive tendencies. Nhận xét:
Cụ thể:
⇒ Đáp án là NO | Đoạn 9: […] Perhaps these negative traits should be seen as a later development, the result of environmental and psychological factors. Research has shown repeatedly that when the natural habitats of primates such as apes and gorillas are disrupted, they tend to become more violent and hierarchical. |
