Tham khảo bài mẫu giải đề IELTS Cambridge 20 – Test 3: Writing Task 2: Stop flying trong bài viết sau của IZONE.
Đề bài IELTS Cambridge 20 – Test 3: Writing Task 2: Stop flying
Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether. Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses? You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write at least 250 words. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. |
Bài mẫu Writing Sample IELTS Cambridge 20 – Test 3: Writing Task 2: Stop flying
Growing environmental awareness has prompted a discernible trend among some individuals to curtail or cease their reliance on air travel due to its significant carbon footprint. This development sparks a debate as to whether the ecological advantages gained outweigh the concurrent drawbacks experienced by individuals and commercial entities. While the environmental gains are undeniable, I would argue that the multifaceted disadvantages for both personal lives and global commerce are often underestimated and may present a more substantial burden.
There are compelling environmental arguments for reducing air travel, primarily concerning the mitigation of climate change. Aircraft produce substantial amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, which contribute significantly to the planet’s warming. A widespread decrease in flights directly translates to a reduction in these harmful emissions, thereby helping combat the climate crisis. Beyond global warming, less air traffic also means reduced noise pollution around airports and improved local air quality, benefiting communities residing near flight paths by lowering their exposure to particulate matter and other pollutants. For instance, during the initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, the drastic reduction in air travel led to noticeable improvements in air quality in major cities and a temporary decrease in global carbon emissions, illustrating the direct correlation between aviation volume and environmental impact.
Despite these ecological advantages, the decision to curtail air travel imposes considerable drawbacks on both individuals and the global economy. For individuals, flying less severely restricts personal freedom and curtails opportunities for cultural exchange, visiting family abroad, or pursuing international educational and career prospects, potentially leading to a sense of isolation and limiting personal growth. For businesses, reduced air travel severely hampers international trade, global supply chains, and face-to-face business interactions vital for deal-making and collaboration. The tourism and hospitality sectors, in particular, would suffer catastrophic job losses and revenue decline, impacting national economies significantly. The severe economic downturn experienced by the aviation and tourism industries during the pandemic vividly illustrates the profound impact that a widespread reduction in air travel can have on livelihoods and global commerce.
In conclusion, while the choice to reduce air travel undoubtedly offers tangible environmental benefits, the associated curtailment of personal freedoms and severe economic repercussions for businesses, especially the vital tourism sector, are substantial. Therefore, it is arguable that these profound drawbacks are not necessarily outweighed by the ecological gains, necessitating a more balanced approach that focuses on sustainable aviation technologies rather than outright travel cessation.
(403 words)
Giảng viên IZONE Thanh Hiền (8.0 IELTS)
Trên đây là phần giải đề IELTS Cambride 20 – Test 3: Writing Task 2: Stop flying do giảng viên IZONE thực hiện.
